What is a DSR? Exploring its Role in Data Privacy and Security

Every person leaves a trail of personal data—whether they realize it or not—and data subject requests (DSRs) give individuals the power to take control of that information. A DSR is a formal request that allows people to access, modify, or delete the personal data held by an organization. For privacy, compliance, technology, and security professionals, understanding DSRs is a cornerstone of ethical data stewardship.

Understanding data subject requests

A Data Subject Request is a formal appeal made by an individual—be it a consumer, customer, or employee—to access, modify, or delete their personal data held by an organization. This process is enshrined in various data privacy regulations (such as the GDPR and the CCPA), granting individuals the autonomy to manage their personal information.

Efficient handling of DSRs isn’t merely about ticking compliance boxes. It’s about building trust, showcasing transparency, and respecting user privacy. Mishandling these requests can lead to hefty fines and reputational damage. For instance, the Austrian Postal Service faced a $10.2 million fine for failing to fulfill data subject rights properly.

What are the types of data subject requests?

Navigating the maze of DSRs requires a clear understanding of their various forms, each addressing different aspects of data control:

• Access requests: Individuals inquire about the personal data an organization holds about them.
• Rectification requests: Requests to correct inaccurate or incomplete personal data.
• Erasure requests: Also known as the “right to be forgotten,” individuals ask organizations to delete their data.
• Restriction requests: Requests to limit the processing of personal data under certain conditions.
• Data portability requests: Individuals seek to obtain their data in a structured, commonly used format to transfer to another service.
• Objection requests: Individuals object to processing their data, often in contexts like direct marketing.
• Automated decision-making and profiling requests: Requests related to decisions made solely on automated processing, including profiling.

Efficiently categorizing and addressing these requests is paramount. Organizations should implement structured processes and leverage technology to manage the influx and variety of DSRs. Automated systems can help identify the type of request, assign tasks to relevant departments, and ensure timely responses.

Data subject request requirements for organizations

Effective DSR management is fundamental to responsible data governance. Organizations must establish clear, well-documented policies to ensure transparency, compliance, and trust. A structured DSR process safeguards personal data, prevents unauthorized access, and ensures timely responses, helping organizations avoid legal penalties and reputational risks.

Each step is critical, from verifying identities to maintaining comprehensive records and enforcing strict data security protocols. By adhering to regulatory mandates and leveraging secure workflows, organizations can confidently handle DSRs while reinforcing their commitment to privacy and compliance.

Embarking on the DSR compliance journey involves several critical components:

Verification

Before retrieving data, organizations must verify the requester’s identity to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. A structured approach ensures security while maintaining compliance with data protection principles.

Initial verification

• Authenticate the identity of the data subject upon receiving a request.
• To streamline the process, utilize existing authentication methods, such as password-protected accounts.

Requesting additional information

• If there is reasonable doubt about the requester’s identity, request additional verification, such as matching information with existing records.
• Adhere to the principle of data minimization—only collect what is necessary to confirm identity.

Verification methods

• Cross-check provided details with internal records (e.g., email addresses or customer IDs).
• When appropriate, consider using third-party verification services to validate identity securely.

Handling complex requests

• Under GDPR, organizations can extend the response timeframe by up to two months if a request is unusually complicated, provided organizations inform the requester of the delay.
• If a request is excessive or unfounded, organizations may deny it or charge a reasonable fee, as the law permits.

Security measures

• Implement strict security protocols to prevent fraudulent requests.
• Be cautious when processing requests from third-party agents—ensure proper authorization before proceeding.
• If fraud is suspected, deny the request and document the justification.

Documentation and compliance

• Maintain records of all verification steps to demonstrate compliance during audits or legal proceedings.
• Be prepared to cooperate with regulatory authorities and provide documentation if requested.

By implementing these verification measures, organizations can ensure that only legitimate requests are processed, reducing the risk of unauthorized data exposure while maintaining compliance with global privacy regulations.

Comprehensive records

Maintaining detailed logs of all DSRs is not just best practice—it’s a regulatory requirement. These records are evidence of compliance and can be invaluable during audits or legal disputes. Logs should detail the nature of the request, actions taken, and processing timelines, ensuring a transparent trail of accountability.

Data security and retention policies

Handling sensitive data during data subject request fulfillment demands robust security measures. Encryption, anonymization, and strict access controls are essential to protect data from unauthorized access or breaches. Additionally, organizations must have clear data retention policies, ensuring data is not held longer than necessary and is disposed of securely when no longer required.

Understanding DSRs under GDPR and CCPA: A comparative glimpse

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) empower individuals with rights over their data, but there are nuances.

Similarities

Right to access: Both regulations grant individuals the right to know what personal data companies collect and how they use it.

Right to deletion: Individuals can request the deletion of their personal data, though exceptions apply.

Transparency: Both laws mandate clear communication about data practices.

Differences

Scope: GDPR applies to all data controllers processing the personal data of EU residents, regardless of the controller’s location. CCPA, however, is specific to organizations operating in California or dealing with California residents.

Data portability: GDPR provides a structured right to data portability, allowing data transfer between controllers. CCPA’s approach is less prescriptive.

Right to object or opt-out: The GDPR’s right to object applies to all processing based on legitimate interests, while the CPRA’s opt-out applies only to the sale or sharing of personal information for targeted advertising. Thus, the GDPR’s right to object is broader than CPRA’s opt-out right.

Under the GDPR and CCPA/CPRA, users have specific rights designed to protect their personal data and privacy. Here is a breakdown of these rights under each regulation:

GDPR

1. Right to access: Individuals can access their data and obtain information about how it is processed.
2. Right to rectification: Users can request the correction of inaccurate personal data.
3. Right to erasure (right to be forgotten): Individuals can request the deletion of their personal data under certain conditions, such as when it is no longer necessary for the original purpose of collection.
4. Right to restrict processing: Users can request the restriction of processing of their data under specific circumstances.
5. Right to data portability: Individuals can receive their data in a structured, commonly used, and machine-readable format and transmit it to another controller.
6. Right to object: Users can object to the processing of their personal data, including for direct marketing purposes.
7. Rights related to automated decision-making: Individuals have rights concerning automated decision-making and profiling, including the right not to be subject to decisions based solely on automated processing.

CCPA/CPRA

1. Right to know: Consumers have the right to know what personal information is being collected, used, shared, or sold and for what purposes.
2. Right to delete: With certain exceptions, individuals can request the deletion of personal information that an organization has collected about them.
3. Right to opt-out: Consumers have the right to opt out of the sale of their personal information.
4. Right to non-discrimination: Under the CCPA/CPRA, users have the right not to be discriminated against for exercising their privacy rights.
5. Right to correct: The CPRA introduces the right to correct inaccurate personal information. Companies can reject correction requests if they verify that the data is accurate or the request lacks supporting documentation.
6. Right to limit use of sensitive personal information: Consumers can limit the use and disclosure of their sensitive personal information (e.g., social security numbers, health data, financial account details).

For a deeper dive into managing consumer rights requests under CCPA, check out TrustArc’s guide on handling consumer requests under CCPA.

CPRA enhancements to data subject requests

The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which took effect on January 1, 2023, expands the CCPA’s consumer rights and introduces additional requirements for organizations processing DSRs:

• Extended data retention and transparency requirements: Companies must inform consumers about data retention periods and cannot store personal data longer than necessary.
• Expanded opt-out rights: CPRA broadens opt-out rights to include the “sharing” of personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising (not just the “sale” of data). The CPRA requires organizations to implement a visible opt-out mechanism for sensitive data use on its website.
• More vigorous enforcement via the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA): CPRA establishes a new regulatory body, the CPPA, which has enforcement powers separate from the Attorney General.

These CPRA updates require organizations to adapt their DSR workflows to meet expanded consumer rights, particularly in data retention, opt-outs, and enforcement compliance. By integrating these changes, organizations can ensure they align with evolving privacy expectations and mitigate regulatory risks.

Understanding the nuances between GDPR, CCPA, and CPRA for organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions is essential to developing tailored compliance strategies. A one-size-fits-all approach is no longer sufficient—organizations must continuously refine their privacy practices to meet the growing demands of global data protection laws while building trust and transparency with consumers.

Handling DSRs from EU residents: GDPR’s extraterritorial scope and U.S. compliance obligations

Under the GDPR, organizations outside the EU—including U.S. companies—may still be subject to GDPR compliance if they process the personal data of EU residents. This extraterritorial scope applies if a U.S. organization:

• Offers goods or services to individuals in the EU (even if no payment is required).
• Monitors the behavior of EU residents, including online tracking, analytics, or targeted advertising.

When a U.S.-based company receives a data subject request from an EU resident, it should take the following steps:

1. Acknowledge the request promptly

GDPR mandates that companies respond to DSRs without undue delay and within one month of receipt. Even if additional time is needed, organizations should acknowledge the request as soon as possible to avoid non-compliance risks.

2. Verify the identity of the requestor

Before taking action, organizations must confirm the identity of the individual submitting the request. Verification prevents unauthorized access to personal data and aligns with GDPR’s security principles. Standard verification methods include:

• Matching the request with existing account credentials.
• Requesting additional identification, if necessary, while following data minimization practices.

3. Assess the request and identify exemptions

Not all DSRs require full compliance. Companies should determine:

• The type of request (access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, or objection).
• Whether exemptions apply, such as legal obligations requiring data retention or overriding legitimate business interests.

4. Fulfill the request if applicable

If the request is valid and no exemptions apply, the company must:

• Provide a copy of the individual’s personal data in a structured, commonly used, machine-readable format (for portability requests).
• Correct inaccuracies upon rectification requests.
• Erase personal data when requested—unless retention is legally required (e.g., tax records, contracts, fraud prevention).

5. Document the entire process

Maintaining detailed logs of each DSR is essential for demonstrating compliance. Companies should document:

• Request details (e.g., type of request, submission date).
• Verification steps taken.
• Assessment and decision-making process.
• Actions performed or reasons for the denial.

6. Communicate clearly with the data subject

Regardless of the outcome, organizations must inform the individual about:

• The actions taken in response to their request.
• Any justifications for denial (if applicable).
• Their right to file a complaint with an EU supervisory authority if they disagree with the outcome.

7. Review and update policies regularly

To stay aligned with GDPR requirements, U.S. companies should:

• Conduct regular reviews of its data subject request handling procedures.
• Ensure their privacy policies explicitly address EU residents and include clear request submission instructions.
• Train employees on GDPR compliance and global privacy law trends.

By following these best practices, U.S. companies can effectively manage DSRs from EU residents, mitigate legal risks, and uphold trust in their data protection practices.

Solutions for managing data subject requests

The complexity and volume of DSRs can be overwhelming, especially for organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions. However, automated DSR solutions can significantly streamline compliance by ensuring accuracy, efficiency, and security in request handling.

Key features to look for in an automated data subject request solution

When evaluating a DSR management platform, prioritize solutions that offer:

Comprehensive request intake and tracking

• Centralized dashboard to manage DSRs from various channels (web forms, email, customer portals).
• Automated case tracking to monitor request status, deadlines, and escalations.

Secure identity verification and fraud prevention

• Multi-factor authentication (MFA) or ID matching to verify requester identities.
• AI-powered fraud detection to flag suspicious or unauthorized requests.

Automated data discovery and retrieval

• Integration with enterprise systems (CRM, HR, cloud storage) to locate and retrieve user data across platforms.
• AI-driven data classification to match requested information with the correct user profile.

Jurisdiction-based compliance rules

• Dynamic workflows that adjust based on GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, LGPD, PIPEDA, and other privacy laws.
• Automated deadline calculations to ensure responses comply with regulatory timeframes (e.g., one month for GDPR, 45 days for CPRA).

Automated decision-making for common requests

• Pre-configured templates for access, correction, deletion, and restriction requests.
• Auto-approval for straightforward cases while escalating complex or high-risk requests.

Secure data delivery and redaction capabilities

• Encrypted file-sharing to deliver personal data securely.
• Automated redaction tools to remove sensitive, proprietary, or third-party data before fulfilling requests.

Audit trails and compliance reporting

• Detailed logs of all request actions, including verification steps and response history.
• Exportable compliance reports for audits and regulatory reviews.

One major global music corporation faced significant challenges keeping up with evolving privacy laws and managing the increasing number of data subject requests. Their existing manual process was inefficient, time-consuming, and prone to compliance risks.

They implemented TrustArc’s Individual Rights Manager (IRM)—an advanced DSR automation platform to solve their challenges. The company accelerated response times to ensure global privacy law compliance and reduced manual workload by over 70%.

By leveraging feature-rich DSR automation tools, organizations can reduce manual effort, improve accuracy, and enhance regulatory compliance at scale. Implementing AI-driven solutions simplifies data subject rights management and strengthens consumer trust by ensuring transparency and security in every request.

Understanding data subject requests and GDPR

The GDPR provides a robust framework for data subject requests, ensuring individuals have control over their personal data. Under GDPR, data subjects can request access to, correct, delete, or transfer their personal data. Organizations must process these requests transparently and within strict timelines to remain compliant.

Key provisions related to DSR compliance

Article 15: Individuals can request that organizations confirm whether they are processing their data and provide a copy of their personal data.

Article 16: Users can request corrections to inaccurate or incomplete data.

Article 17: Individuals may request the deletion of their personal data under certain conditions, such as when the data is no longer necessary.

Article 18: Users can request processing limitations if they contest the data’s accuracy or deem the processing unlawful.

Article 20: Individuals can receive their personal data in a structured format and transmit it to another controller.

Article 21: Data subjects can object to data processing, particularly in cases of direct marketing.

Article 22: Unless exceptions apply, users can avoid decisions made solely on automated processing, including profiling.

Implementing GDPR-compliant data subject request policies

Organizations can align with GDPR by implementing the following:

Clear procedures: Establish structured internal processes for handling DSRs.

Training programs: Educate employees on GDPR requirements and user rights.

Technology solutions: Automate request intake, verification, and processing to ensure compliance.

Regular audits: Conduct assessments to improve DSR response efficiency.

Transparent communication: Inform users of their rights and how to exercise them through privacy policies and notices.

What are the response times for data subject requests?

GDPR compliance timelines

Standard response time: One month from the receipt of a DSR.

Extensions: An additional two months if the request is justified under complexity or volume, with prior notification to the requester within a month.

Non-action notification: If the request is denied, the data subject must be informed within one month with justification and appeal options.

CCPA/CPRA response requirements

Standard response time: 45 days.

Extensions: A one-time extension of 45 additional days, if necessary, with prior notice to the requester.

However, CPRA introduces additional compliance obligations:

• Organizations must process correction requests within the same timeframe as access and deletion requests.
• If denying a correction request, the company must explain the reason and allow consumers to submit a statement of dispute.
• For requests to limit the use of sensitive personal information, organizations must comply promptly and provide a clear mechanism for opt-out requests (e.g., a dedicated link on their website).

Other global regulations

Brazil’s LGPD: Organizations must respond promptly, though no specific timeline is mandated.

Canada’s PIPEDA: Organizations must respond within 30 days, with a possible 30-day extension in specific cases.

Singapore’s PDPA: Organizations must respond within 30 days of receiving a request.

Additional jurisdictions:

Austria: Response within 8 weeks.

France: Response within 2 months.

Germany: Typically, within 3 weeks.

Ireland: No later than 40 days.

Poland: Within 30 days.

Spain: Response within 30 days; effective access within 10 days of reply.

How to handle and document data subject requests

Managing DSRs effectively requires a structured approach to ensure compliance, security, and efficiency. From verifying identities to securely delivering requested data, each step plays a crucial role in safeguarding personal information while meeting regulatory obligations. Organizations can handle DSRs with accuracy, speed, and accountability by implementing transparent processes and leveraging automation. Here’s a breakdown of key steps to streamline data subject request management.

Steps to manage DSRs effectively

1. Identity verification: Prevent unauthorized access by confirming the requester’s identity using authentication protocols.
2. Data retrieval: Locate and compile relevant user data across systems.
3. Legal and ethical assessment: Evaluate whether the request aligns with compliance standards.
4. Secure data delivery: Provide the requested information in a secure format.
5. Logging requests: Maintain detailed logs to document compliance.
6. Automate workflows: Leverage AI-driven tools to streamline processing and tracking.

Automating the DSR process with AI for compliance

Benefits of AI-powered data subject request solutions

• Automated verification: AI cross-references user data to verify identities efficiently.
• Faster processing: Reduces response times by automating retrieval and fulfillment.
• Regulatory compliance: Ensures adherence to GDPR, CCPA, and other global laws.
• Scalability: Manages high volumes of requests with minimal human intervention.
• Error reduction: Minimizes human errors through automated workflows.

Empowering privacy with efficient DSR processes

In the ever-evolving data privacy landscape, data subject requests are a testament to individual empowerment and organizational accountability. For professionals at the helm of privacy and compliance, mastering data subject request management is both a regulatory imperative and a trust-building endeavor. By understanding the nuances of various regulations, implementing robust processes, and leveraging advanced technologies, organizations can navigate the DSR landscape with confidence and integrity.

Platforms like TrustArc’s Individual Rights Manager automate the entire DSR lifecycle—from intake and verification to fulfillment and documentation. These tools reduce manual effort and enhance accuracy by auto-assigning tasks based on request type and jurisdiction.

Request a demo

FAQs about data subject requests (DSRs)

Can an organization charge a fee for processing a DSR?

Under GDPR, processing DSRs is free unless the requests are excessive or unfounded, in which case a reasonable fee may apply. Before charging a fee, an organization must carefully document why it classifies a request as excessive or unfounded. The CCPA prohibits fees but allows refusal for excessive, repetitive, or manifestly unfounded requests.

How should a company handle a DSR from a former employee?

Verify the requester’s identity and provide any retained personal data within legal timeframes. Inform the requester of any applicable exemptions if certain records must be retained for legal reasons.

What steps should organizations take if they receive a fraudulent DSR?

Organizations should have strong verification processes to prevent unauthorized data subject requests. If fraud is suspected, they can request additional verification, such as matching previously provided identification or requiring a notarized document. If fraud is confirmed, deny the request and document the reason for compliance purposes.

Can an organization deny a DSR if it involves trade secrets or proprietary information?

Yes, organizations can deny a DSR if fulfilling it would expose trade secrets, confidential business information, or violate another individual’s privacy rights. However, they must clearly explain the denial and, where possible, supply non-sensitive personal data that is not exempt.

What is the best way to handle high volumes of DSRs?

Organizations should leverage automation and AI-driven solutions to manage large volumes of DSRs efficiently. Privacy management platforms like

TrustArc’s Individual Rights Manager help streamline request intake, verification, tracking, and fulfillment. Additionally, maintaining a standardized workflow, training staff, and having clear internal guidelines can improve efficiency and reduce compliance risks.

How does CPRA change data subject requests for California consumers?

CPRA expands consumer privacy rights beyond CCPA by introducing:

• The right to correct personal data.
• The right to limit the use of sensitive personal information.
• Stronger transparency rules require organizations to disclose data retention periods.
• A new enforcement agency (CPPA) with increased oversight over DSR compliance.

To stay compliant, organizations must update their privacy policies, internal workflows, and automated DSR solutions to accommodate CPRA’s stricter requirements.